When is the best time to observe Gamma Fornacis?

Gamma Fornacis is best observed from September through November, with peak visibility during October when it transits around midnight in the Northern Hemisphere.

Where is Gamma Fornacis located in the sky?

Gamma Fornacis lies in the constellation Fornax at right ascension 02h 50m and declination -24° 34′.

What telescope do I need to split Gamma Fornacis?

Splitting Gamma Fornacis requires an aperture of roughly 60 mm or larger — the components are separated by about 37.3″ at magnitudes near 6.1. The companion is about 5.0 magnitudes fainter, so glare from the primary — not separation — sets the minimum aperture. Larger apertures and steady seeing help resolve the pair cleanly.

Gamma Fornacis — Double Star in Fornax

HIP 13197; Gamma1 Fornacis

DoubleStar Fornax (For) Visible

Star Map + List + Plan Star Hop

Observe

1Physical Properties

Magnitude 6.14

Spectral Type K1III

Star Color Orange (B-V 1.07)

2Position & Identifiers

RA 02h 49m 51.0s

Dec -24° 33' 37.0"

Constellation Fornax (For)

HR 844

HIP 13197

HD 17713

Bayer Gamma1

Double Cat 2167

SIMBAD Wikipedia

3How easy to split?

Primary 6.1 mag Companion 11.2 mag Separation 37.3″

Sign in and configure your equipment and default location to see a personalized row.

Telescope	Bortle 3	Bortle 4	Bortle 5
80 mm refractor 80mm refr.	Hard+	Hard	V. hard+
150 mm Newton 150mm Newt.	Medium+	Medium	Hard+
Celestron C8 (203 mm SCT) C8 203mm	Easy	Medium+	Medium

Easy Medium Hard Very hard Impossible

Bortle 3 = rural · 4 = outer suburbs · 5 = suburbs

4Visibility

Set a location in User Settings to see visibility data.

Best season Sep – Nov (peak: Oct)

5Multiple Star System Triple

Components 3 (triple)

Component IDs AC

Separation 37.3″

Companion Mag 11.2

Position Angle 129°

Star Colors A: Orange

Discoverer HJ 2161

Notes

AB CPM, B, 13v at 12"; C, optical.

Separation over time

Measured 1830 → 2015 (185 y)

Separation drift 45.0" → 37.3" (-7.70")

Rate -0.0416" / y

PA drift 169° → 129° (-40°, -0.216°/y)

Apparent motion is significant on a human timescale — worth revisiting in a decade.

Measured from the WDS observational archive. No orbital solution has been derived — most likely the period is too long to fit an orbit to the available measurement arc.