Menu

Double Stars — A Guide for Observers

Two suns where one appeared — how to find, split, and appreciate the night sky's finest pairs.

23 min read Matthias Wüllenweber

Key Takeaways

  1. 1

    More than half of all stars in our galaxy are members of multiple-star systems. What looks like a single point through the eyepiece is often two, three, or six stars in a gravitational dance.

  2. 2

    Double stars are the foul-weather friends of visual astronomy — no dark sky, no filters, no photography required. A small telescope, steady air, and a sharp eye split most of them.

  3. 3

    The Dawes limitR = 116 / D mm in arcseconds — tells you the tightest pair your aperture can resolve. It assumes equal-brightness components under good seeing.

  4. 4

    Color-contrast pairs are the visual showstoppers: gold-and-blue Albireo, the autumn rival Almach, orange-and-green Rasalgethi. Slight defocusing can help the color jump out.

  5. 5

    Patience at the eyepiece beats aperture. Seeing fluctuates — a lucky half-second of still air is when most tight pairs split, and if you glance away you miss them.

What Are Double Stars?

Point a telescope at a bright star and sometimes something magical happens: what looked like a single point of light cleanly splits into two. A tight pair of gems — one gold, one blue, or both diamond-white — separated by a sliver of dark sky. You have just resolved a double star.

Double stars (also called binary stars when physically bound) are among the most rewarding objects for amateur astronomers. They require no dark sky, no expensive filters, and no astrophotography gear. A small telescope, steady air, and a sharp eye are all you need. On nights when the Moon washes out deep-sky objects, doubles remain unaffected — they are the perfect foul-weather friends of the visual observer.

More than half of all stars in our galaxy are members of multiple star systems. What we see as a single point is often two, three, or even six stars locked in a gravitational dance. Studying them has been central to astrophysics: binary stars gave us the first direct measurements of stellar mass, and they continue to be the primary way astronomers weigh the stars.

For the visual observer, double stars offer an endlessly varied challenge. Some pairs are wide and bright, easy in any telescope. Others push the limits of your optics and the atmosphere itself. Developing the skill to split tight pairs is one of the most satisfying disciplines in amateur astronomy.

Types of Double Stars

Not all double stars are the same. The key distinction is between pairs that are physically connected and those that only appear close together by chance.

Optical Doubles

Two stars that happen to lie along the same line of sight but are at vastly different distances. They have no physical connection — one might be 50 light-years away while the other is 500. They appear close in the sky purely by coincidence. Over time, their relative positions change due to their independent proper motions, and they will eventually drift apart.

Visual Binaries

True gravitationally bound pairs that are far enough apart (and close enough to us) to be resolved in a telescope. Both stars orbit their common center of mass. Over decades or centuries, patient observers can watch them trace out their orbital paths. Castor and Porrima are classic examples where orbital motion has been tracked for over two hundred years.

Spectroscopic Binaries

Pairs too close to resolve visually, but revealed by periodic Doppler shifts in their spectral lines. As the stars orbit each other, one approaches us (blue-shifted) while the other recedes (red-shifted). Mizar was the first spectroscopic binary ever discovered (1889) — each of its two visible components is itself a spectroscopic pair.

Eclipsing Binaries

Pairs whose orbital plane is aligned with our line of sight, so the stars periodically pass in front of each other. We see regular dips in brightness. The most famous example is Algol (Beta Per), the "Demon Star," whose 2.87-day eclipses were noticed by ancient astronomers. Eclipsing binaries are also covered in the Variable Stars guide.

In practice, the boundaries blur. Many "visual binaries" also show spectroscopic signatures, and some wide doubles once thought to be optical have turned out to share common proper motion — a sign they are physically associated after all. The Washington Double Star Catalog (WDS), the definitive reference, lists over 150,000 entries.

The View Through the Eyepiece

When you look at a star through a telescope at high magnification, you are not seeing a point of light. You are seeing a diffraction pattern — a small bright disk surrounded by faint concentric rings. This is the Airy disk, named after the British astronomer George Biddell Airy, and it is a fundamental consequence of the wave nature of light passing through a circular aperture.

The Airy disk is not a flaw — it is what a perfect telescope shows for a point source. Its size depends on the telescope's aperture: larger apertures produce smaller Airy disks, which means sharper images and the ability to resolve tighter pairs.

Eyepiece simulator showing Albireo's golden and blue components at 34.5 arcsecond separation
Nightbase's eyepiece simulator for Albireo (Beta Cyg) — the sky's most famous color-contrast pair. At 34.5" separation, it splits easily in any telescope. The golden primary (K2, mag 3.1) and sapphire companion (B9.5, mag 4.7) show vivid color.

When two stars are close together, their Airy disks overlap. At wide separations you see two distinct disks with clear dark sky between them. As the pair gets tighter, the disks merge — first you see an elongated blob, then eventually a single disk with no hint that two stars are there. The point at which you can just tell there are two stars is the resolution limit of your telescope.

Eyepiece simulator showing Castor's two white components at 5.4 arcsecond separation
Castor (Alpha Gem) at 5.4" separation — a tighter pair that requires moderate magnification. Both components are white A-type stars (mag 1.9 and 3.0).

What affects the view

  • Aperture — Larger telescopes produce smaller Airy disks. A 200mm telescope resolves pairs roughly twice as tight as a 100mm one.
  • Magnification — You need enough power to see the separation. Too little and the pair looks merged; too much and the image gets dim and mushy.
  • Seeing — Atmospheric turbulence bloats the Airy disk. On a poor night, even a large telescope may not resolve a pair that is easy when the air is still.
  • Magnitude difference — A bright primary next to a faint companion is much harder to split than an equal pair at the same separation, because the bright star's glare swamps the faint one.

Resolution & the Dawes Limit

Every telescope has a theoretical resolution limit determined by its aperture. Two classical formulas are used by double star observers:

Rayleigh Criterion

R = 138 / D (arcseconds, D in mm)

Derived from diffraction theory. Two stars are considered resolved when the central maximum of one Airy disk falls on the first dark ring of the other. This is a conservative limit — with practice, observers can split pairs somewhat tighter than this.

Dawes Limit

R = 116 / D (arcseconds, D in mm)

An empirical limit derived by William Rutter Dawes in the 1860s from extensive visual testing with equal-brightness pairs. About 16% tighter than Rayleigh, it represents what a skilled observer can actually achieve under good conditions. It is the standard benchmark for double star observers.

Aperture Dawes limit Rayleigh limit Example pair you can split
60 mm 1.93" 2.30" Cor Caroli (19.2") — easy
100 mm 1.16" 1.38" Mesarthim (7.3") — comfortable
150 mm 0.77" 0.92" Izar (2.8") — resolved
200 mm 0.58" 0.69" Porrima (3.4") — clean split
250 mm 0.46" 0.55" Antares (2.7") — challenge due to glare

Unequal pairs are harder

The Dawes limit applies to equal-brightness pairs under excellent seeing. In practice, unequal pairs are harder: a mag 1 primary with a mag 8 companion requires more aperture than the separation alone would suggest, because the bright star's diffraction rings overwhelm the faint companion. Sirius (11.1" separation) is notoriously difficult despite its wide gap because the primary is 10 magnitudes brighter than its white dwarf companion.

Choosing Your Equipment

Telescope type

Refractors are the traditional double-star instrument. Their unobstructed aperture produces the cleanest Airy disks with the least scattered light. A high-quality 100mm refractor can outperform a 150mm reflector on tight pairs because it has no secondary mirror to add diffraction spikes and scatter.

That said, reflectors and catadioptrics work perfectly well for the vast majority of doubles. The central obstruction slightly reduces contrast but does not affect the resolution limit. A 200mm Newtonian resolves tighter pairs than a 100mm refractor — raw aperture wins. Diffraction spikes from the spider vanes can be distracting on bright stars, but they do not prevent splitting.

Magnification

Double star work demands higher magnification than most deep-sky observing. A useful rule of thumb:

Minimum magnification ≈ 300 / separation (arcsec)

So a pair at 10" needs at least 30×, a pair at 2" needs around 150×, and pairs near 1" may need 300× or more. In practice, start at moderate power to find the star, then increase magnification until you see two distinct Airy disks.

Eyepieces

Short-focal-length eyepieces (4–8 mm) are essential for high-power work. Orthoscopic eyepieces are prized by double-star observers for their razor-sharp on-axis images and minimal ghosting. Plössl and planetary eyepieces also work well. Wide-field designs are less critical here — you are looking at the center of the field, not the edges.

A Barlow lens (2× or 3×) effectively doubles or triples your eyepiece collection. A 10mm eyepiece with a 2× Barlow gives you a 5mm equivalent — very useful for pushing magnification on tight pairs without buying extra short-focal-length eyepieces.

Eyepiece simulator showing Izar's orange and blue-white components at 2.8 arcsecond separation
Izar (Epsilon Boo, 2.8", mag 2.7 + 4.8). A classic test pair — the name means "veil" in Arabic, and Struve called it Pulcherrima ("most beautiful"). The orange giant primary and blue-white companion create a striking color contrast in larger apertures.

Color Contrast Pairs

The most visually stunning double stars are those where the two components have different colors. Star color comes from surface temperature: hot stars are blue-white, cool stars are orange or red. When a hot star and a cool star orbit each other, the telescope eyepiece becomes a jewel box.

Color perception in doubles is partly physiological. The human eye judges color by contrast: a pale yellow star next to a blue one will look more intensely golden than it would in isolation. Observers sometimes report "impossible" colors — green or purple companions — that are contrast effects rather than true stellar colors. This only adds to the magic.

The finest color pairs

  • Albireo (Beta Cyg — 34.5", mag 3.1 + 4.7). The showpiece double. Gold and sapphire, universally regarded as the most beautiful color pair in the sky. Easy in the smallest telescope. A perfect first double star for beginners. The B-V color indices (1.13 and −0.07) span nearly the full range of stellar color.
  • Almach (Gamma And — 9.6", mag 2.3 + 5.0). Often called Albireo's autumn rival. The golden-orange primary (K3 giant) contrasts with a blue-white companion that is itself a tight triple system. At 9.6", it needs a bit more magnification than Albireo but is still easy in a 60mm scope.
  • Izar (Epsilon Boo — 2.8", mag 2.7 + 4.8). "Pulcherrima" — the most beautiful. Orange and blue-white at a challenging 2.8". You need at least 100mm aperture and 150× to cleanly split it, but the reward is one of the finest sights in the eyepiece.
  • Rasalgethi (Alpha Her — 4.8", mag 3.5 + 5.4). The red supergiant primary (M5) glows deep orange-red, while the companion appears yellow-green by contrast. The primary is also a variable star, adding another dimension to repeated observations.
  • Eta Cassiopeiae (Achird — 13.5", mag 3.4 + 7.4). A sunny yellow primary (F9V, very similar to our Sun) with a deep red dwarf companion (M0). The color difference is dramatic, and at 13.5" the pair is comfortable in a small scope. Achird is just 19 light-years away — one of the nearest double stars.

Tip: defocus to see the color

Slightly defocusing a bright star spreads its light into a disk, making the color easier to see. This works especially well for the primary of unequal pairs where the companion is lost in glare when focused.

Splitting Techniques

Resolving tight doubles is a skill you develop with practice. Here are the techniques experienced observers use:

1. Wait for good seeing

Atmospheric seeing is the single biggest factor. On nights of poor seeing, the star images boil and bloat — even a large telescope is reduced to the resolution of a much smaller one. The best double-star nights are those with steady, still air: often hazy or slightly overcast, when the atmosphere is stable. Ironically, the crystal-clear nights that deep-sky observers love can have terrible seeing.

Monitor the seeing by looking at a bright star at high magnification. If the Airy disk is stable and the first diffraction ring is visible as a complete circle, conditions are good. If the disk is a writhing blob, wait for another night or try pairs wider than about 3".

2. Let the telescope acclimate

A telescope that is warmer or cooler than the ambient air creates its own turbulence. Mirrors and lenses need time to reach thermal equilibrium — 30 to 60 minutes for a typical reflector, longer for large or thick-mirrored instruments. Until the optics are acclimated, tight doubles will be impossible even on an excellent night.

3. Use the right magnification

Start at moderate power (around 100×) to center the star and assess the seeing. Then increase magnification step by step. The goal is to find the sweet spot: enough power to clearly separate the Airy disks, but not so much that the image becomes dim and turbulent.

For very tight pairs near the Dawes limit, try slightly above the conventional maximum (2× per mm of aperture). At 2.5× or even 3× per mm, the image gets dimmer but the separation becomes more apparent. This only works on nights with very good seeing.

4. Work with the diffraction pattern

When a pair is near the resolution limit, you will not see two clean disks. Instead, look for:

  • Elongation — The Airy disk looks slightly oval rather than round. This is the first sign that a close companion is present.
  • A notch in the first ring — The first diffraction ring appears brighter on one side, or has a bump or notch. The companion's Airy pattern is distorting the primary's ring.
  • Flickering separation — In moments of steady seeing, the single blob briefly splits into two. These "flashes" of resolution confirm the pair is there, even if you cannot hold it continuously.

5. Handle unequal pairs

When the companion is much fainter than the primary, the bright star's glare dominates. Techniques to reveal the faint companion:

  • Increase magnification to darken the sky background and spread the primary's light over a larger area.
  • Place the primary just outside the field of view. The companion may become visible when the glare is partially blocked.
  • Use an occulting bar eyepiece to mask the bright star.
  • Observe when the bright star is at lower altitude, so atmospheric extinction slightly dims it.
  • Try averted vision: look slightly to the side. Your peripheral vision is more sensitive to faint objects.

6. Rack-test with the focuser

Slowly rack the focuser in and out of focus. A true close companion will appear as a separate out-of-focus disk on the opposite side from the primary, while optical artifacts remain fixed relative to the main star. This is one of the oldest double-star detection tricks.

Patience is key

Sit at the eyepiece for at least five minutes. Turbulence fluctuates — there will be moments of clarity even on mediocre nights. Many splits happen in a lucky half-second of still air. If you glance and move on, you will miss them.

A Tour of Famous Doubles

From wide easy splits to demanding close pairs, here is a progression of showpiece doubles. Each link opens the star's detail page with Nightbase's interactive eyepiece simulator, so you can preview the view at different magnifications before heading out.

Easy — Any telescope

  • Albireo (Beta Cyg — 34.5", mag 3.1 + 4.7). Gold and blue. The most celebrated color double in the sky. Any magnification from 20× up shows the pair beautifully. Visible all summer and autumn from northern latitudes. Whether the components are truly gravitationally bound remains debated.
  • Mizar & Alcor (Zeta UMa — 14.4" + 709" to Alcor). The most famous double in the Big Dipper's handle. Mizar itself splits into a close pair (A + B, 14.4") in any telescope, while Alcor sits 12 arcminutes away — visible to the naked eye. Both Mizar A and B are themselves spectroscopic binaries, making this a sextuple system. Historically used as an eyesight test by many cultures.
  • Almach (Gamma And — 9.6", mag 2.3 + 5.0). Gold-orange and blue. Often called the autumn Albireo. The companion is itself a triple system, though you need a large telescope and excellent seeing to split it further.
  • Eta Cassiopeiae (Achird) (13.5", mag 3.4 + 7.4). Yellow and red. The primary is a Sun-like star; the companion is a red dwarf. One of our closest neighbors at 19 light-years. The orbital period is about 480 years — the position angle has shifted noticeably since Herschel first measured it.
  • Cor Caroli (Alpha CVn — 19.2", mag 2.9 + 5.5). The "Heart of Charles" in Canes Venatici. A blue-white primary with a fainter companion, easy to split at any magnification. The primary is the prototype of the Alpha² CVn class of magnetic, chemically peculiar stars.
  • Gamma Delphini (9.8", mag 5.1 + 5.0). A nearly equal pair of golden-yellow stars in the small but distinctive constellation Delphinus. The similar brightness and warm colors make this an underrated gem.

Moderate — 80–150 mm aperture

  • Castor (Alpha Gem — 5.4", mag 2.0 + 3.0). Two white A-type stars forming a nearly equal pair. Both are spectroscopic binaries, and a distant red dwarf (Castor C, also eclipsing) brings the total to six stars. The separation changes slowly as they orbit each other with a period of about 450 years. Currently widening — easier now than it was decades ago.
  • Polaris (Alpha UMi — 18.4", mag 2.0 + 9.1). The North Star has a faint companion that is a rewarding test of careful observing. Despite the wide 18.4" separation, the 7-magnitude brightness difference hides the companion in the primary's glare. Moderate aperture (100 mm+) and high magnification (150×+) reveal it. Polaris is also a Cepheid variable.
  • Rigel (Beta Ori — 9.5", mag 0.1 + 6.8). The brilliant blue supergiant in Orion has a faint companion that is an excellent test for glare management. The 6.7-magnitude difference means you need steady seeing, good magnification (150×+), and patience. The companion itself is a close binary.
  • Mesarthim (Gamma Ari — 7.3", mag 4.8 + 4.6). The first double star ever resolved through a telescope, by Robert Hooke in 1664. A matched pair of white A-type stars forming a clean, elegant split at moderate magnification.

Challenging — 150 mm+ aperture, good seeing

  • Izar (Epsilon Boo — 2.8", mag 2.7 + 4.8). Struve's "Pulcherrima." At 2.8" with a 2-magnitude difference, this is a genuine test. You need 150 mm or more and at least 200× to see the blue companion separate from the orange giant. When you do, it is breathtaking.
  • Porrima (Gamma Vir — 3.4", mag 3.6 + 3.5). A near-twin pair of F0 stars in a 169-year orbit. The separation changes dramatically: it was as close as 0.4" around 2005 (impossible in amateur scopes) and is now widening back out to 3.4". Currently an excellent target for 100–150 mm telescopes. By 2030, it will be even easier.
  • Antares (Alpha Sco — 2.7", mag 1.0 + 5.4). A deep red supergiant with a blue-green companion. The 4.4-magnitude difference and low declination make this one of the great challenges. The companion sometimes appears green by contrast with the fiery primary — one of the few cases where a star genuinely looks green. Best attempted on very steady nights with 200 mm+ aperture.
  • Sirius (Alpha CMa — 11.1", mag −1.5 + 8.4). The ultimate challenge in double-star observing. The companion, Sirius B, is a white dwarf — the first ever discovered. Despite the comfortable 11" separation, the primary outshines the companion by nearly 10 magnitudes, drowning it in diffraction rings. You need 200 mm+, excellent seeing, high magnification (300×+), and preferably a hexagonal aperture mask to suppress diffraction spikes. The orbital period is 50 years; the pair is near maximum separation now, making this the best decade to attempt it.
  • Alnitak (Zeta Ori — 2.5", mag 2.1 + 3.7). The easternmost star of Orion's Belt hides a close blue companion. Both components are hot O/B-type supergiants. The tight 2.5" separation and brilliance of the primary make this a worthy challenge for 150 mm+ telescopes on steady winter nights.
Eyepiece simulator showing Almach's golden and blue-white components at 9.6 arcsecond separation
Almach (Gamma And) — a gold-orange K3 giant paired with a blue-white companion at 9.6".

Multiple Star Systems

Many "double" stars turn out to be triple, quadruple, or even higher multiples. These systems are hierarchically organized: tight inner pairs orbit each other quickly, while wider outer companions orbit the inner pair on much longer timescales. This hierarchy is essential for stability — a random three-body system would eject one member quickly.

The Double-Double: Epsilon Lyrae

The most famous multiple system for visual observers is Epsilon Lyrae, the "Double-Double" near Vega. To the naked eye (or binoculars) it is a wide pair separated by 208". But point a telescope at each component and both split again: the northern pair at 2.2" and the southern pair at 2.3". You see four stars where one appeared — a satisfying test of both your optics and the seeing.

A 100mm telescope at 150× can resolve both pairs on a good night. With smaller apertures, you may split one pair but not the other, depending on conditions.

Other notable multiples

Castor — sextuple system (6 stars)

The visual pair (A + B at 5.4") is easy in a small scope. Both A and B are spectroscopic binaries. A distant red dwarf, Castor C, is an eclipsing binary. Six stars total — one of the richest known systems.

Mizar — sextuple system (6 stars)

The visual pair (A + B at 14.4") was the first telescopic double, noted by Riccioli in 1650. Mizar A was the first spectroscopic binary (1889). Mizar B is also a spectroscopic binary. Including Alcor (which has its own faint companion), the system totals six stars.

Polaris — quintuple system (5 stars)

The Cepheid variable primary (Polaris Aa) has a spectroscopic companion (Polaris Ab) and the visual companion (Polaris B) at 18.4". Two more distant stars complete the system. Finding the faint B component next to the bright Cepheid is a classic observing challenge.

Almach — quadruple system (4 stars)

The blue companion (B) to the golden primary (A) is itself a tight double (BC at 0.2" — only resolvable in large professional telescopes), and B is a spectroscopic binary. Four stars in a spectacular color package.

Recording Your Observations

Double star observing has a long tradition of careful measurement and record-keeping. Even today, amateur measurements contribute to professional databases. Here is what to note:

What to record

  • Resolved / Not resolved — The most basic datum. Could you split the pair? If not, did you see elongation or any hint of the companion?
  • Position angle (PA) — The direction from the primary to the companion, measured in degrees from north (0°) through east (90°), south (180°), and west (270°). You can estimate this by turning off your drive: stars drift west, which defines the east-west line. North is 90° counterclockwise from the drift direction.
  • Separation estimate — In arcseconds. Experienced observers estimate this by comparing to the known Airy disk size for their aperture, or by timing how long the pair takes to drift across a high-power eyepiece field.
  • Colors — Note the color of each component. Color perception is subjective and varies between observers, so your personal impression is valuable. Use descriptive terms: golden, topaz, white, blue-white, orange, deep red.
  • Conditions — Seeing (in arcseconds or on the Antoniadi I–V scale), transparency, telescope, magnification, and any notes about the observation (moon phase, altitude of the star, wind).

Sketching

A simple sketch captures what no written description can. Draw a circle for the eyepiece field, mark the primary and companion with dots proportional to their brightness, note the orientation (N, E arrows), and add any field stars. Even a rough sketch, years later, instantly brings back the observation.

Log it in Nightbase

Nightbase's observation logger lets you record double star observations with notes, photos, and audio memos. Each star's detail page shows the position angle, separation, and component colors alongside the interactive eyepiece simulator — perfect for planning your session before going outside.

Test Yourself

Q1 What is the Dawes limit for a 150mm refractor, and which of these pairs would be at the edge of its capability: Albireo (34.5"), Izar (2.8"), or Sirius (11.1")?

Dawes limit = 116 / 150 ≈ 0.77". Izar at 2.8" is well within the theoretical limit and should split cleanly. Albireo is trivially easy. Sirius's 11.1" is nominally far above the Dawes limit — but the 10-magnitude brightness difference means it's actually the hardest of the three despite the wide separation. The Dawes limit assumes equal-brightness pairs.

Q2 You're at the eyepiece trying to split a 1.5" pair. The star looks like a writhing blob and won't hold still. What's almost certainly the problem, and what should you do?

Atmospheric seeing is unstable. Tight doubles near the Dawes limit require steady air. Options: wait at the eyepiece for at least 5 minutes for moments of stillness; check if the telescope has acclimated to ambient temperature (30–60 min typical); try a wider pair for the night; or come back on a different night. Crystal-clear nights often have bad seeing — hazy, still nights are often better for doubles.

Q3 Why does slightly defocusing a bright star help you see its color?

A focused star is essentially a point — almost no photons hit any single retinal cone, so color perception is weak. Defocusing spreads the light into a larger disk, so many cones receive light simultaneously and the color registers strongly. This is why extreme focus can make a star look white, while slight defocus reveals golds, oranges, and blues.

Q4 Epsilon Lyrae is known as the "Double-Double." What does that mean, and what aperture do you need to split it?

To the naked eye or binoculars it appears as one wide double (208" separation). Put a telescope on each component and both split again — the northern pair at 2.2" and the southern pair at 2.3". Four stars where one appeared. A 100mm telescope at 150× can resolve both pairs on a good night. Smaller apertures may split one pair but not the other.

Q5 Castor is sometimes called a sextuple system. How can one point of light resolve into six stars?

Hierarchy. The visual pair A+B (5.4") splits easily in any small scope. Each of A and B is itself a spectroscopic binary (too close to resolve visually — detected by Doppler shifts in their spectra). A third visual component, Castor C, sits well away — and Castor C is itself an eclipsing binary. Two visual doubles, three spectroscopic pairs, one eclipsing pair: six stars total in a stable hierarchical system.

Q6 Position angle is measured how, and why is knowing it useful?

PA is the angle from the primary to the companion, measured in degrees from north (0°) through east (90°) and south (180°). You can estimate it by turning off your drive and watching stars drift west — north is 90° counterclockwise from the drift direction. For binary systems with known orbits (Castor, Porrima, Sirius), tracking the PA over years reveals orbital motion — a way amateurs can contribute to professional databases.

double-stars observing stars binaries